Price discrimination by needless complexity
(This is another script for a forthcoming weekly rant. Recycling disclaimer.)
News, views, and commentary from a free market point of view.
(This is another script for a forthcoming weekly rant. Recycling disclaimer.)
This appeared in the Hoover Freedom Frequency, and Commons Dispatch, but for any of you who don’t read that, here it is, with a few tweaks.
I was invited to the “Festival Internazionale dell’ Economia” in Turin, to speak about inflation and debt.
It is still thrilling when a paper is finally published.
[This is a third post based on scripts for the “weekly rant.” ]
[This is based on a second script for an upcoming “weekly rant.” Part 1 explored an interesting WSJ survey on how popular populist policies are.]
As you may have heard, Mike Woodford and Bob Hall won the 2026 Nobel prize.
[This is based on a script for an upcoming “weekly rant”.
A Substack lets me share fun new ideas.
Interest-paying electronic money, completely safe without deposit insurance, would be a great thing.
The dog that didn’t bark is often meaningful.
The link to Barron’s was wrong in my previous post. The correct link below:
I’ve done a variety of video and other media lately that (some) readers may find interesting.
This follows up my last post on lowering rates to lower inflation.
Is there a coherent story in which the Fed should lower interest rates now?
An interesting brouhaha has broken out in France, lately famous for reinvigorating the idea of wealth taxes: The French government should default on (“annul” “cancel” — the left is great at euphemisms) its debt held by the European Central Banks.
US long term interest rates are surging.
Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna just introduced a bill proposing a permanent national 5% wealth tax on billionaires, along with an ambitious spending program for the results.
Today, a few small recent economic news items add up to a bigger picture.
Inflation is stubbornly high, and the Fed mulls whether to raise rates.
I prepared two “weekly rants” on AI which will come out in a few weeks.
This is an essay I wrote for Hoover’s Freedom Frequency substack, in their series on the founders.
Follow the money past the initial recipient.
I wrote two opeds on the future of the Fed for the Washington Post. Full text of the first one, focusing on monetary policy, in my previous post here. The second focusing on financial regulation is joint with Amit Seru.
As part of a big revision of “Inflation”, a short book resulting from last year’s Brunner lecture, I wrote the following short section.
This is an OpEd at the Washington Post. Their title: “How to protect the economy from the ghosts of 1979.” (Really 1951!) I posted an excerpt a month ago. Here is the full version.
The G7 (Group of 7) economic confab is on in the lovely Evian-Les-Bains, France.
The recent Piketty-Saez-Stiglitz revival of wealth taxes, ostensibly to improve the lot of the poor, makes many mistakes.
The lab-leak shock really caused inflation
Updating “Inflation,” I took “supply” and “demand” shocks more seriously, in a FTPL framework.